School Accountability Report Card    
  Reported for School Year 2002-2003  

Published During 2003-2004

Notes regarding the source and currency of data:
Data
included in this School Accountability Report Card (SARC) are consistent with State Board of Education guidelines, which are available at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/definitions03.asp . Most data presented in this report were collected from the 2002-03 school year or from the two preceding years (2000-01 and 2001-02). Due to the certification timelines for graduation, dropout, and fiscal information, the data for these sections of the report were collected in 2001-02.

School Information District Information
 School Name  Kensington Elementary  District Name  West Contra Costa Unified
 Principal Nancy Kawata  Superintendent Dr. Gloria Johnston
 Street  90 Highland Blvd.  Street  1108 Bissell Ave.
 City, State, Zip  Kensington, CA    94708-1023  City, State, Zip  Richmond, CA    94801-3135
 Phone Number 510-526-7343  Phone Number 510-234-3825
 FAX Number 510-526-3189  FAX Number 510-236-6784
 Web Site http://www.wccusd.k12.ca.us/kensington/  Web Site http://www.wccusd.k12.ca.us/
 E-mail Address nancy.kawata@gw.wccusd.k12.ca.us  E-mail Address Paul.Ehara@gw.wccusd.k12.ca.us
 CDS Code  07-61796-6004808  SARC Contact Paul Ehara

School Description and Mission Statement
 Kensington Hilltop School is part of the West Contra Costa Unified School District. The educators, students, and parents are dedicated to creating a learning environment in which children can acquire a well-balanced, standards-based education from kindergarten through grade six. Approximately 75% of our students come from the surrounding community, with 25% from all over the urban school district. Based on October 2003 CBEDS, our current enrollment is 492 students, which includes:
  • 8% African American
  • 11% Hispanic
  • 17% Asian
  • 55% White
  • 7% Multiple or no response
  • 5% English learner students
  • 14% GATE
  • 5% RSP

Our students speak at least eight primary languages, in addition to English. This rich and complex mix of backgrounds encourages interaction and mutual respect. We are united in a common goal: a distinguished education for all students.

We believe that all students should progress as far and as fast as their effort and ability allow. We ask all students to demonstrate their mastery of reading, language arts, mathematics, science, history-social science, and computer science. We also strive to develop in children the benefits of physical education, and visual and performing arts. All students have equal access to core programs as well as supplemental curriculum. This is achieved through a commitment to excellence between the school and community. Working together, we use district, state, Parent Teachers Association, Dad's Club, Kensington Education Foundation funds, as well as teacher and principal-authored grants to enable us to meet the program goals set by the professional staff and approved by our School Site Council each year.

We care deeply for our students and use proven methods to provide a consistent, schoolwide environment where they can grow and learn each day. We encourage the early attainment of problem-solving skills, conflict-management skills and a healthy and happy attitude as these young children learn to meet the challenges of daily living in a school which has high expectations for behavior and academic excellence.


Opportunities for Parental Involvement
 Contact Person Name   Nancy Kawata, Principal  Contact Person Phone Number   510-526-7343

Kensington Hilltop School is fortunate in that we have parents who are willing to spend their time and energy in raising funds to help make this an excellent school. There are four parent organizations: Parent Teachers Association (PTA), Dad's Club, Kensington Education Foundation (KEF), and the School Site Council (SSC). There is also a parent Gifted and Talented Education (GATE) advisory committee that meets twice each year.

The PTA, Dad's Club, and the KEF are open to all parents and can be joined at any time during the year. The PTA is the main service group, staffing many of the school activities such as Room Parents, Library, and staff luncheons, assemblies, Science Fair and graduation activities. KEF concentrates on direct appeals to parents, foundations and corporations, and coordinates our fundraisers. The Dad's Club is another service body that specializes in evening and weekend events such as Halloween Carnival Night, and Spring Carnival Night. School Site Council, which is mandated by the State for all SBCP schools, is composed of five parents with an equal number of teachers and the principal. The Council reviews curriculum and test results. Utilizing current data, an academic plan for the year is determined.

In addition to these organizations, parents volunteer in a multitude of ways: room parents, library volunteers, yard monitors, office volunteers, etc. 


I. Demographic Information

Student Enrollment, by Grade Level
Data reported are the number of students in each grade level as reported by the California Basic Educational Data System (CBEDS).
 Grade Level  Enrollment  Grade Level  Enrollment
 Kindergarten 69   Grade 9
 Grade 1 84   Grade 10
 Grade 2 87   Grade 11
 Grade 3 79   Grade 12
 Grade 4 80   Ungraded Secondary
 Grade 5 74     
 Grade 6 72 
 Grade 7
 Grade 8
 Ungraded Elementary  Total Enrollment 545 

Student Enrollment, by Ethnic Group
Data reported are the number and percent of students in each racial/ethnic category as reported by CBEDS.
 Racial/Ethnic Category  Number
of
Students
 Percent
of
Students
 Racial/Ethnic Category  Number
of
Students
 Percent
of
Students
 African-American 40  7.3   Hispanic or Latino 59  10.8 
 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.2   Pacific Islander 0.2 
 Asian 102  18.7   White (Not Hispanic) 299  54.9 
 Filipino 0.2   Multiple or No Response 42  7.7 

II. School Safety and Climate for Learning

School Safety Plan
 Date of Last Review/Update   February 23, 2004  Date Last Discussed with Staff  March 1, 2004
Our school safety plan is a continually evolving document. This year the principal and a teacher site representative attended the Standardized Emergency Management Systems training provided by our district. We are presently working on earthquake preparedness. Each classroom has a backpack complete with emergency supplies and backpack inventories are conducted on a regular basis. Parents have collaborated to provide the school with emergency supplies located in a conex box on campus. Kensington also has a Hamm radio operation and we are designated as the emergency evacuation center for the surrounding community. 

School Programs and Practices that Promote a Positive Learning Environment
The foundation for our students' social growth begins with our CHARACTER COUNTS! (CC! Youth-ethics Initiative ) program. CC! identifies six character traits as the pillars of outstanding citizens: trustworthiness, respect, responsibility, fairness, caring, and citizenship . Each month one of the traits is emphasized. Educators instruct students in the trait, model the trait, note when students are displaying that character trait, and integrate the trait into the curriculum. Posters are displayed in every classroom, as well as the multi-purpose room and library. Lesson ideas can easily be accessed from the Web. Administrators and teachers use the CC! traits as reminders to students who are being disciplined. There has never been a crime report filed at Kensington; our suspension rate is less than 1% per year.

Suspensions and Expulsions
Data reported are the number of suspensions and expulsions (i.e., the total number of incidents that result in a suspension or expulsion). The rate of suspensions and expulsions is the total number of incidents divided by the school's total enrollment as reported by CBEDS for the given year. In unified school districts, a comparison between a particular type of school (elementary, middle, high) and the district average may be misleading. Schools have the option of comparing their data with the district-wide average for the same type of school.
   School  District
 2001  2002  2003  2001  2002  2003
 Number of Suspensions 2 17 11 5643 12705 12903
 Rate of Suspensions 0.4% 3% 2% 16% 37% 37%
 Number of Expulsions 0 0 0 27 43 38
 Rate of Expulsions 0 0 0 0.08% 0.12% 0.11%

School Facilities
 

Kensington Hilltop School has the advantage of being located high on a hill in Kensington. We have rapid access to local law enforcement and security services. Signs are posted on the outside of classroom doors reminding visitors/volunteers to sign in at the office and wear identification stickers. To ensure student safety, rigorous procedures addressing student arrival and departure, and before and during school assignments have been established.

The existing Kensington campus was built in 1949. It has become outdated. Infrastructure deficiencies include structural weaknesses, undersized data and power capabilities, accessibility problems, congestion, antiquated mechanical systems, inadequate communication systems, undersized administration, library and stage, disrepair of restrooms, asbestos tiles, inadequate lighting system, disrepair of floors, window/window coverings, interior/exterior finishes, roof, classroom furnishings, and poor on-site security and outdoor lighting and fire truck access. Kensington currently consists of one-story buildings that house the classrooms, administration, and multi-purpose building. We also have eight portable classrooms at the site (two of them are bungalows) that house the library, RSP and Periscope program, music and art classrooms, and five portables.

Funded by the bond measure, Measure M, construction on Kensington Elementary will begin June 2004. Implementing new electrical, mechanical, and technology systems will update the outdated utility infrastructure of the school. Building structures will be strengthened. All facilities will be handicapped accessible. A new wing will be added to the west end of the site comprising the library/media center space, multi-use science and art classrooms, and standard classrooms. The MPR will be updated with a new stage, and new finishes, and the administration will be upsized to fit current and future needs. The project is budgeted at $15.8 million.

School facilities are cleaned daily. For repairs, safety concerns are given the highest priority, followed by work that impacts the educational program.


III. Academic Data

Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR)
Through the California Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, students in grades 2-11 are tested annually in various subject areas. Currently, the STAR program includes California Standards Tests (CST) in English-language arts and mathematics in grades 2-11, science and history/social science in grades 9-11, and a norm-referenced test, which tests reading, language, and mathematics in grades 2-11, spelling in grades 2-8, and science in grades 9-11.

California Standards Tests (CST)
The California Standards Tests (CST) show how well students are doing in relation to the state content standards. Student scores are reported as performance levels. The five performance levels are Advanced (exceeds state standards), Proficient (meets state standards), Basic (approaching state standards), Below Basic (below state standards), and Far Below Basic (well below state standards). Students scoring at the Proficient or Advanced level meet state standards in that content area. Detailed information regarding results for each grade and proficiency level can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov/ or by speaking with the school principal. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.

CST - All Students
Data reported are the percent of students achieving at the proficient or advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard) and percent not tested. For mathematics, science, and history/social science, data regarding the percent not tested, by grade level and subgroup, are available at http://star.cde.ca.gov/.
 Performance Level  School  District  State
 2001  2002  2003  2001  2002  2003  2001  2002  2003
English Language Arts
 Proficient or Advanced  77  77  80  21  21  24  30  32  35
 Not Tested  2  5  1  11  10  2  6  8  1
Mathematics
 Proficient or Advanced    69  75    20  23    31  35
 Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---
Science
 Proficient or Advanced          19  17    30  27
 Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---
History/Social Science
 Proficient or Advanced          16  17    28  28
 Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---

CST - Racial/Ethnic Groups
Data reported are the percent of students achieving at the proficient or advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard) and percent not tested. For mathematics, science, and history/social science, data regarding the percent not tested, by grade level and subgroup, are available at http://star.cde.ca.gov/.
 Performance Level  African-
American
 American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
 Asian  Filipino  Hispanic
or Latino
 Pacific
Islander
 White
(not
Hispanic)
English Language Arts
 Proficient or Advanced  56    87    60    87
 Not Tested  3    0    0    0
Mathematics
 Proficient or Advanced  53    83    60    79
 Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---
Science
 Proficient or Advanced              
 Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---
History/Social Science
 Proficient or Advanced              
 Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---

CST - Subgroups
Data reported are the percent of students achieving at the proficient or advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard) and percent not tested. For mathematics, science, and history/social science, data regarding the percent not tested, by grade level and subgroup, are available at http://star.cde.ca.gov/.
Performance Level  Male  Female English
Learners
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
Students With
Disabilities
Migrant
Education
Services
Yes No Yes No
English Language Arts
 Proficient or Advanced  80  81  50  49  84  50  83  
 Not Tested  0  1  0  0  1  0  1  
Mathematics
 Proficient or Advanced  78  71  64  46  78  42  78  
 Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---
Science
 Proficient or Advanced                
 Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---
History/Social Science
 Proficient or Advanced                
 Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---

Norm-Referenced Test (NRT)
Reading and mathematics results from the Norm-Referenced Test (NRT), adopted by the State Board of Education (this was the Stanford 9 test up until 2003, but was changed to the California Achievement Test, Sixth Edition for 2003), are reported for each grade level as the percent of tested students scoring at or above the 50th percentile (the national average). School results are compared to results at the district and state levels. Detailed information regarding results for each grade level can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov/ or by speaking with the school principal. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.

NRT - All Students
Data reported are the percent of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile.
Subject  School  District  State
 2001  2002  2003  2001  2002  2003  2001  2002  2003
 Reading  90  91  80  35  34  33  44  45  43
 Mathematics  87  86  82  40  42  37  53  55  50

NRT - Racial/Ethnic Groups
Data reported are the percent of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile.
Subject  African-
American
 American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
 Asian  Filipino  Hispanic
or Latino
 Pacific
Islander
 White
(not
Hispanic)
 Reading  50    81    61    89
 Mathematics  59    88    71    85

NRT - Subgroups
Data reported are the percent of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile.
Subject    Male    Female  English
Learners
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
 Students With
Disabilities
 Migrant
Education
Services
 Yes  No  Yes  No
 Reading  80  81  36  51  83  47  83  
 Mathematics  83  80  64  60  84  42  86  


California Physical Fitness Test
Data reported are the percent of students meeting fitness standards (scoring in the healthy fitness zone on all six fitness standards). Detailed information regarding the California Physical Fitness Test may be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/statetests/pe/pe.html. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.
 Grade
Level
 School  District  State
  Total   Female   Male    Total   Female   Male    Total   Female   Male 
 5  13.0  16.7  10.3  12.2  11.3  13.1  23.8  25.2  22.3
 7        19.0  18.0  20.0  27.8  29.6  26.0
 9        11.0  7.7  13.9  24.8  23.3  26.2

Academic Performance Index (API)

The Academic Performance Index (API) is a score on a scale of 200 to 1000 that annually measures the academic performance and progress of individual schools in California. On an interim basis, the state has set 800 as the API score that schools should strive to meet.

Growth Targets: The annual growth target for a school is 5 percent of the distance between its Base API and 800. The growth target for a school at or above 800 is to remain at or above 800. Actual growth is the number of API points a school gained between its base and growth years. Schools that reach their annual targets are eligible for awards. Schools that do not meet their targets and have a statewide API rank of one to five are eligible to participate in the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program (II/USP), which provides resources to schools to improve their academic achievement. There was no money allocated to the II/USP Program in 2002 or 2003.

Subgroup APIs and Targets: In addition to a schoolwide API, schools also receive API scores for each numerically significant subgroup in the school (i.e., racial/ethnic subgroups and socioeconomically disadvantaged students). Growth targets, equal to 80 percent of the school's target, are also set for each of the subgroups. Each subgroup must also meet its target for the school to be eligible for awards.

Percent Tested: In order to be eligible for awards, elementary and middle schools must test at least 95 percent of their students in grades 2-8 and high schools must test at least 90 percent of their students in grades 9-11 on STAR.

Statewide Rank: Schools receiving a Base API score are ranked in ten categories of equal size (deciles) from one (lowest) to ten (highest), according to type of school (elementary, middle, or high school).

Similar Schools Rank: Schools also receive a ranking that compares that school to 100 other schools with similar demographic characteristics. Each set of 100 schools is ranked by API score from one (lowest) to ten (highest) to indicate how well the school performed compared to schools most like it.

API criteria are subject to change as new legislation is enacted into law. Detailed information about the API and the Public Schools Accountability Act (PSAA) can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/psaa/api/ or by speaking with the school principal.

Schoolwide API
 API Base Data  API Growth Data
   2000  2001  2002   From
2000
to 2001
From
2001
to 2002
From
2002
to 2003
 Percent Tested  99  99  100  Percent Tested  99  100  99
 API Base Score  874  889  886  API Growth Score  901  892  893
 Growth Target  #  A  A  Actual Growth  27  3  7
 Statewide Rank  10  10  10  
 Similar Schools Rank  6  9  9

API Subgroups - Racial/Ethnic Groups
 API Base Data  API Growth Data
   2000  2001  2002   From
2000
to 2001
From
2001
to 2002
From
2002
to 2003
 Asian  Asian
 API Base Score  933  924  913  API Growth Score  940  928  921
 Growth Target  #  A  A  Actual Growth  7  4  8
 White (Not Hispanic)  White (Not Hispanic)
 API Base Score  892  902  911  API Growth Score  911  920  915
 Growth Target  #  A  A  Actual Growth  19  18  4

API Subgroups - Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
 API Base Data  API Growth Data
   2000  2001  2002   From
2000
to 2001
From
2001
to 2002
From
2002
to 2003
 API Base Score        API Growth Score      
 Growth Target        Actual Growth      

Awards and Intervention Programs
Eligibility for statewide award or intervention programs is based on API growth data from the previous academic year.
The Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program was not funded for the year 2002 or 2003.

 School  District
 Federal Programs  2001  2002  2003  Federal Programs  2001  2002  2003
 Recognition for
 Achievement (Title 1)
 No  No  No  Number of Schools Identified
 for Program Improvement
 0  0  8
 Identified for Program
 Improvement (Title 1)
 No  No  No  Percent of Schools Identified
 for Program Improvement
 0.0  0.0  12.7
 Exited Title 1 Program
 Improvement
 No  No  No  
 Years Identified for
 Program Improvement
     
 California Programs  2001  2002  2003
 Eligible for Governor's
 Performance Award
 Yes  No  Yes
 
 Eligible for II/USP
 No  ---  ---
 
 Applied for II/USP Funding
 No  ---  ---
 
 Received II/USP Funding
 No  ---  ---

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
The federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) requires that all students perform at or above the proficient level on the state's standards-based assessments by 2014. In order to achieve this goal and meet annual performance objectives, districts and schools must improve each year according to set requirements. Data reported show whether all groups of students in the school made Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). Detailed information about AYP can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ayp/ or by speaking with the school principal.
 Groups  School  District
 2001  2002  2003  2001  2002  2003
 All Students  ---  ---  Yes  ---  ---  Yes
 African American  ---  ---  N/A  ---  ---  Yes
 American Indian or Alaska Native  ---  ---  N/A  ---  ---  N/A
 Asian  ---  ---  Yes  ---  ---  Yes
 Filipino  ---  ---  N/A  ---  ---  Yes
 Hispanic or Latino  ---  ---  N/A  ---  ---  Yes
 Pacific Islander  ---  ---  N/A  ---  ---  Yes
 White (not Hispanic)  ---  ---  Yes  ---  ---  Yes
 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged  ---  ---  N/A  ---  ---  Yes
 English Learners  ---  ---  N/A  ---  ---  Yes
 Students with Disabilities  ---  ---  N/A  ---  ---  No

V. Class Size

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution
Data reported are the average class size and the number of classrooms that fall into each category (i.e., number of students), by grade level, as reported by CBEDS.
 Grade  2001  2002  2003
 Avg.
Class
Size
Number of Classrooms  Avg.
Class
Size
Number of Classrooms  Avg.
Class
Size
Number of Classrooms
 1-20  21-32  33+  1-20  21-32  33+  1-20  21-32  33+
 K  17.20  5      18.25  4      20.00  4    
 1  18.43  7      19.00  3      20.00  4    
 2  17.00  4      19.40  5      20.00  6    
 3  19.50  6      19.00  6      19.80  5    
 4  30.33    3    30.00    2    32.00    1  1
 5  30.50    2    32.50    1  1  33.00      1
 6  33.00      2  30.50    2    32.00    1  1
 K-3                  20.00  2    
 3-4                        
 4-8  29.00    1    31.00    1    32.33    2  1
 Other                        

Class Size Reduction Participation
California's K-3 Class Size Reduction program began in 1996 for children in kindergarten and grades one through three. Funding is provided to participating school districts to decrease the size of K-3 classes to 20 or fewer students per certificated teacher. Data reported are the percent of students in each grade level in the school that are in a class size reduction classroom.
 Grade Level  Percent of Students Participating
 2001  2002  2003
 K  100  100  100
 1  100  100  100
 2  100  100  100
 3  100  100  100

VI. Teacher and Staff Information

Teacher Credentials
Data reported are the number of teachers (full-time and part-time). Each teacher is counted as '1'. If a teacher works at two schools, he/she is only counted at one school. Data are not available for teachers with a full credential and teaching outside his/her subject area.
     2001      2002      2003  
 Total Teachers
 
 32  26  31
 Teachers with Full Credential
 (full credential and teaching in subject area)
 32  26  31
 Teachers with Emergency Credential
 (includes District Internship, University Internship, Pre-Interns, and Emergency Permits)
     
 Teachers with Waivers
 (does not have credential and does not qualify for an Emergency Permit)
     

Highly Qualified Teachers
The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) requires local educational agencies (LEAs) to report specific data regarding highly qualified teachers. As of December of 2003, the State Board of Education (SBE) had not approved a definition for use in reporting data pertaining to highly qualified teachers. Therefore, the requirement that LEAs include these data will not apply to reports published during the 2003-04 school year.
The State Board of Education is scheduled to approve a definition for "highly qualified teacher" in 2004. Once approved, LEAs will be required to use the definition to provide data on report cards published during the 2004-05 school year.

Teacher Evaluations
The primary purpose of evaluation is to improve the educational programs, practices and services within the schools through increased effectiveness of each teacher. As outlined in the contract between the district and United Teachers of Richmond, temporary and probationary teachers are evaluated at least once each school year. Permanent teachers are formally evaluated every other year. If any deficiency is noted, the evaluator provides support such as specific suggestions and the opportunity to visit other classrooms. If a teacher receives an "Unsatisfactory" evaluation, he/she is required to participate in the district's Peer Assistance and Review (PAR) program. Our district is piloting a new evaluation system in a few schools that is based on the California Standards for the Teaching Profession. This pilot includes teacher self-assessment, professional growth plans and objectives, and guided reflection.  

Substitute Teachers
Teachers and other personnel report absences using an automated phone system called SubFinder. Teachers may contact a substitute themselves, or direct the SubFinder system to locate a substitute. We are usually able to find substitute teachers when needed. Occasionally there are not enough substitutes to fill all positions, and the administrators and teachers at the school assume the responsibilities of the absent staff member. 

VII. Curriculum and Instruction

School Instruction and Leadership
Kensington Hilltop School is committed to providing a comprehensive educational program in a safe learning environment. Our mission is to have all students know, understand, and be able to demonstrate proficiency of the grade level set forth by the state of California and adopted by the West Contra Costa Unified School District. We recognize that in order for our students to achieve exemplary performance levels, i.e., proficiency in English Language Arts, math, history-social science, and science, four components need to be addressed: (1) there needs to be a continual review and updating of our school community's vision statement based on the needs of our student population, (2) the review of assessment data needs to be an ongoing process, (3) the staff and community need to be informed and active participants in the process, and (4) we need to continually monitor our school effectiveness. These components are addressed in the development and implementation of our Single Plan for Pupil Achievement (SPPA).

The first priority has to be the identification of students' needs. In addition to on-going assessment, Kensington's educators allocate a day each fall to the comprehensive analyzing of STAR test data and district assessments in order to identify areas for improvement. Analysis for the SPPA is greatly assisted by our Accountability Department, which facilitates easy disaggregation by student characteristics, e.g., English Learner students, gender, ethnicity, Special Education, Gifted and Talented Education (GATE), and socioeconomically disadvantaged. Utilizing our data, we can look at all of our subgroups to determine whether we are meeting our students' diverse needs and modify our instructional practices.

Our principal collaborates with the School Site Council (SSC). Upon review and approval of the SPPA by the SSC, fiscal alignment takes place based on identified goals. The SPPA, however, is not a static document. Expenditures can be adjusted based on approval by the SSC. At Kensington we are sensitive to the fact that some parents are very active participants in school via SSC, KEF, Dad's Club, and Parent Teacher Association meetings, etc., while other parents need to receive the information in various formats. Community participation is actively sought through the dissemination of student information that encourages feedback. Information is shared via parent/teacher conferences, Back to School Night meetings, parent/student handbook, parent workshops, teacher newsletters, WCCUSD and Kensington websites, SSC, PTA, WCCUSD Board meetings, Hilltop News, Thursday packet, Kenvue , local newspapers, and School Accountability Report Card (SARC). The community continually receives updates regarding student achievement via parent/teacher conferences, distribution of STAR assessments, Academic Performance Index (API) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) information, progress reports, newsletter and newspaper articles, and through the Web. For all curricular areas State Board-adopted and Board-adopted standards-based core instructional materials are used in each grade level.

Interventions for students begin with the classroom educator. Kensington educators are knowledgeable about appropriate development for students. They efficiently identify students who are struggling academically or emotionally. Classroom interventions begin immediately and teachers seek assistance from the specialists. Students who need additional help beyond the classroom are referred to a number of services. These include: Student Study Team (SST); reading/math intervention program, school psychologist; and Special Education program that includes speech therapy and resource instruction.

In addressing our EL population, our performance goal is that all limited-English-proficient (LEP) students will become proficient in English and reach high academic standards, at a minimum attaining proficiency or better in reading/language arts and mathematics. To ensure students' development of English proficiency while meeting state academic standards, our EL students are placed with CLAD or SDAIE certificated instructors. Those students designated as English learners are instructed using the Into English! Program.

Kensington students who are identified as GATE are clustered in classrooms and instructed by educators who differentiate instruction on a daily basis. Our district GATE coordinator and GATE advisory committee facilitate professional development for all educators. In the past our students have participated in Odyssey of the Mind in addition to other community extension programs.

The SPPA charts the course for our school community and facilitates dialogue with staff, parents, and community members. Professional development, intervention programs, and materials are aligned with the vision of the Kensington Hilltop School SPPA.


Professional Development
The primary areas of focus of staff development are literacy and mathematics. These areas were identified four years ago as part of the district's strategic planning. Student achievement data was used to determine the goals and the need for professional development. Teachers attend a minimum of 18 hours of professional development as negotiated by their contract. Continuous professional development is offered above and beyond that in literacy and mathematics through seminars, workshops, and coaching. Classroom Management training is available with follow-up support sessions. The district technology plan supports technology training opportunities for teachers. New teachers have the opportunity to participate in the BTSA program that provides a variety of on-going professional development experiences and individual support mentors. Our Pre-intern, Intern and Paraprofessional grants provide teachers with classes and opportunities to receive their teaching credentials. The district PAR program provides one coach who supports teachers experiencing difficulty through one-on-one coaching, a classroom visitation network, and on-going workshops. Paraprofessionals are offered customized workshops at our annual Classified Training Day. Classroom instructional aides are provided classes to support their being NCLB compliant. Non-instructional aides are provided customized training at the Classified Training Day as well as other on-going professional development opportunities provided by their individual departments. The methods by which professional development is delivered includes: weeklong seminars and academies, follow-up workshops and coaching, after-school workshops, Saturday workshops, and conference attendance. Teachers are supported by: principals, who have the same core curriculum professional development training opportunities as teachers; in-class coaching by outside consultants, curriculum guides, and support providers; and grade-level/department/school-wide meetings to analyze student performance data.

Quality and Currency of Textbooks and Other Instructional Materials

WCCUSD K-8 textbooks adoptions

In support of our district-wide focus on literacy, we began using the following language arts textbooks and materials in 2002-03: Open Court for kindergarten through fifth grade; Prentice Hall for sixth through eighth grade; and, High Point for fourth through eighth graders who need intervention.

In 2001-02, we adopted the following texts: In math, Harcourt Brace for K-6, and Prentice Hall for Pre-Algebra students. In science, Holt for 6-8. In social studies, McGraw Hill Adventures in Time & Place for K-3, and Harcourt Brace for 4-6. Houghton Mifflin for Grade 7, and, Holt, Rinehart and Winston for Grade 8.

In 2003-04, we adopted Algebra Structure and Method, McDougal Litell by Brown, Dolciani, et al. for our Algebra 1 students, and Prentice Hall Algebra by Smith, Charles, et al for Algebra 1A and 1B students.

Our language arts, math, social studies, and grade 7-8 science texts are all standards based and selected from state-approved lists. We have used a hands-on, kit-based science adoption, the Full Option Science System, in grades K-5 for several years. We are working to supplement the FOSS kits with other materials in order to provide our students with standards-based science instruction.

Current, core-subject textbooks are provided for each student.    

Instructional Minutes
The California Education Code establishes the required number of instructional minutes per year for each grade. Data reported compares the number of instructional minutes offered at the school level to the state requirement for each grade.
 Grade
Level
 Instructional Minutes
 Offered  State Requirement
 K  36,000  36,000
 1  50,455  50,400
 2  50,455  50,400
 3  50,455  50,400
 4  54,035  54,000
 5  54,035  54,000
 6  54,035  54,000

Total Number of Minimum Days
There are 12 minimum days – the first day of school, Back to School Night, Halloween, parent conference days (5 minimum days), the day before Thanksgiving, the day before winter break, Open House, and the last day of school.  


IX. Fiscal and Expenditure Data

Average Salaries (Fiscal Year 2001-2002)
Data reported are the district average salary for teachers, principals, and superintendents, compared to the state average salaries for districts of the same type and size, as defined by Education Code Section 41409. The district average principal salary is shown separately for elementary, middle, and high schools, but the state average principal salary is combined.
 Category  District
Amount
 State Average
For Districts
In Same Category
 Beginning Teacher Salary  33110  35980
 Mid-Range Teacher Salary  48542  57139
 Highest Teacher Salary  63744  73953
 Average Principal Salary (Elementary)  77713  100810
 Average Principal Salary (Middle)  80822
 Average Principal Salary (High)  88026
 Superintendent Salary  154499  171096
 Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries  39.23  43.28
 Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries  5.08  5.20

Expenditures (Fiscal Year 2001-2002)
Data reported are total dollars expended in the district, and the dollars expended per student at the district compared to the state average. Detailed information regarding expenditures may be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fiscal/financial/.
 District  District  State Average
For Districts
In Same Category
 State Average
All Districts
 Total Dollars  Dollars per Student
(ADA)
 Dollars per Student
(ADA)
 Dollars per Student
(ADA)
 $241095326  $7328  $6770  $6719

Types of Services Funded
Eighty percent of our operating expenditures go to salaries and benefits of teachers and support staff. Other expenses include books, supplies, and operational services such as utilities.

Much of the operating revenues we receive from state, federal and local resources is for programs with specific guidelines and regulations governing their use. Examples include Special Education, Title I, II, II, V, School Improvement, Healthy Start, Gifted and Talented, Tenth Grade Counseling, Immediate Intervention Underperforming Schools Program and High Priority Schools grants.

Revenues generated by the passage of two local bond measures, Measure M and Measure D, are accounted for in separate bond funds and designated exclusively for building modernization.