School Accountability Report Card    
  Reported for School Year 2002-2003  

Published During 2003-2004

Notes regarding the source and currency of data:
Data
included in this School Accountability Report Card (SARC) are consistent with State Board of Education guidelines, which are available at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/definitions03.asp . Most data presented in this report were collected from the 2002-03 school year or from the two preceding years (2000-01 and 2001-02). Due to the certification timelines for graduation, dropout, and fiscal information, the data for these sections of the report were collected in 2001-02.

School Information District Information
 School Name  Hanna Ranch Elementary  District Name  West Contra Costa Unified
 Principal Anita Hayward  Superintendent Dr. Gloria Johnston
 Street  2482 Refugio Valley Road  Street  1108 Bissell Ave.
 City, State, Zip  Hercules, CA    94547-1299  City, State, Zip  Richmond, CA    94801-3135
 Phone Number 510-245-9902  Phone Number 510-234-3825
 FAX Number 510-799-5795  FAX Number 510-236-6784
 Web Site www.wccusd.k12.ca.us/hannaranch/  Web Site http://www.wccusd.k12.ca.us/
 E-mail Address anita.hayward@gw.wccusd.k12.ca.us  E-mail Address Paul.Ehara@gw.wccusd.k12.ca.us
 CDS Code  07-61796-6112015  SARC Contact Paul Ehara

School Description and Mission Statement
Hanna Ranch is a K-5 school with a collaboratively developed mission to “provide all of our students with the highest quality education by addressing all curriculum areas and diverse learning needs and by utilizing effective teaching strategies. We will maintain a safe, respectful, interdependent and responsible community environment to give our students the tools to become independent, contributing and responsible citizens of our community and of the world.” Our curriculum continues to emphasize literacy and problem solving. Our staff is continually working together to refine our standards-based, student data-driven curriculum. 

Opportunities for Parental Involvement
 Contact Person Name   Kathy Tegg  Contact Person Phone Number   245-9902
We build and value strong home-school partnerships through our School Site Council; PTA and our classroom volunteer network. The SSC develops the school plan and budget and recommends it to the School Board, reviews the implementation of this plan and periodically assesses and annually reviews the effectiveness of the plan. Our English Language Learners Advisory Committee monitors and advises us on the implementation of our English Learners' program. In addition, we have a PTA/SSC Liaison who works to support a consistent information flow between these key parent groups. Community members collaborated with faculty to frame our equity-based mission statement that guides all our planning and improvement processes. Our PTA has monthly meetings that keep parents in touch with the school program and student achievement, provide parenting presentations, family learning nights and other community building activities.  

I. Demographic Information

Student Enrollment, by Grade Level
Data reported are the number of students in each grade level as reported by the California Basic Educational Data System (CBEDS).
 Grade Level  Enrollment  Grade Level  Enrollment
 Kindergarten 80   Grade 9
 Grade 1 79   Grade 10
 Grade 2 73   Grade 11
 Grade 3 84   Grade 12
 Grade 4 70   Ungraded Secondary
 Grade 5 78     
 Grade 6
 Grade 7
 Grade 8
 Ungraded Elementary  Total Enrollment 470 

Student Enrollment, by Ethnic Group
Data reported are the number and percent of students in each racial/ethnic category as reported by CBEDS.
 Racial/Ethnic Category  Number
of
Students
 Percent
of
Students
 Racial/Ethnic Category  Number
of
Students
 Percent
of
Students
 African-American 86  18.3   Hispanic or Latino 60  12.8 
 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0   Pacific Islander 0.0 
 Asian 97  20.6   White (Not Hispanic) 66  14.0 
 Filipino 102  21.7   Multiple or No Response 59  12.6 

II. School Safety and Climate for Learning

School Safety Plan
 Date of Last Review/Update/discussed with staff   Discussed/trained throughout year; participated in earthquake simulation 4/20/04
We hold monthly fire drills and disaster drill twice a year. Hanna Ranch has a fully developed Comprehensive School Safety Plan. Staff members have received SEMS emergency response training this year. They participated in an all city earthquake simulation drill that gave them the opportunity to activate our plan and to apply their training. Thanks to our PTA, we are in the process of supplying ourselves with all the necessary supplies to ensure an effective and caring response to any emergency.  

School Programs and Practices that Promote a Positive Learning Environment

Our discipline approach centers on supporting student in making good choices, accepting responsibility and taking charge of themselves. Each classroom develops and posts its own rules/agreements. Students receive direct instruction in how to talk things out and how to take constructive social action. Intermediate students serve as mentors for younger students in need of extra academic and social support. Many of our classrooms are participating in a Character Education pilot program that is aligned with our language arts program and engages students in activities to promote responsibility, cooperation, patience and caring. Social and academic improvement and achievement are celebrated through our “Cougar” rewards, Braggin Dragon, 5000 Page club and Honor Roll.  


Suspensions and Expulsions
Data reported are the number of suspensions and expulsions (i.e., the total number of incidents that result in a suspension or expulsion). The rate of suspensions and expulsions is the total number of incidents divided by the school's total enrollment as reported by CBEDS for the given year. In unified school districts, a comparison between a particular type of school (elementary, middle, high) and the district average may be misleading. Schools have the option of comparing their data with the district-wide average for the same type of school.

   School  District
 2001  2002  2003  2001  2002  2003
 Number of Suspensions 5 6 11 5643 12705 12903
 Rate of Suspensions 1% 1% 2% 16% 37% 37%
 Number of Expulsions 0 0 0 27 43 38
 Rate of Expulsions 0 0 0 0.08% 0.12% 0.11%


School Facilities

Staff members monitor the school grounds ten minutes before the start of school and immediately after both of our dismissals. Our parent traffic volunteers maintain a safe and efficient traffic flow during morning drop-off times. All visitors are required to check in at the office when visiting the school. They are given visitor badges to identify them while they are on campus. Additional safety lighting was installed in our parking lot and along the playground.

Our new facility is designed to support teaching and learning. Each building houses three classrooms built around a shared space that is available for small group learning and teacher collaboration. We added three portable classrooms. Each classroom has a phone and access to a multi-media system. We offer our students a fully automated library with three computers with Internet access. Our updated computer lab consists of twenty-seven Dell Optiplex GX 240 computers and six Dell C610 laptops with airport cards. These laptops are available as a “mobile lab” for use in the classrooms for student research and publishing. The PTA is in the process of equipping each of our 1-5 classrooms including our NSH classroom and Learning Center with new Dell computers.  

Hanna Ranch was built in 1995.

School facilities are cleaned daily. For repairs, safety concerns are given the highest priority, followed by work that impacts the educational program.


III. Academic Data

Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR)
Through the California Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, students in grades 2-11 are tested annually in various subject areas. Currently, the STAR program includes California Standards Tests (CST) in English-language arts and mathematics in grades 2-11, science and history/social science in grades 9-11, and a norm-referenced test, which tests reading, language, and mathematics in grades 2-11, spelling in grades 2-8, and science in grades 9-11.

California Standards Tests (CST)
The California Standards Tests (CST) show how well students are doing in relation to the state content standards. Student scores are reported as performance levels. The five performance levels are Advanced (exceeds state standards), Proficient (meets state standards), Basic (approaching state standards), Below Basic (below state standards), and Far Below Basic (well below state standards). Students scoring at the Proficient or Advanced level meet state standards in that content area. Detailed information regarding results for each grade and proficiency level can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov/ or by speaking with the school principal. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.

CST - All Students
Data reported are the percent of students achieving at the proficient or advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard) and percent not tested. For mathematics, science, and history/social science, data regarding the percent not tested, by grade level and subgroup, are available at http://star.cde.ca.gov/.
 Performance Level  School  District  State
 2001  2002  2003  2001  2002  2003  2001  2002  2003
English Language Arts
 Proficient or Advanced  51  51  52  21  21  24  30  32  35
 Not Tested  4  6  3  11  10  2  6  8  1
Mathematics
 Proficient or Advanced    61  62    20  23    31  35
 Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---
Science
 Proficient or Advanced          19  17    30  27
 Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---
History/Social Science
 Proficient or Advanced          16  17    28  28
 Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---

CST - Racial/Ethnic Groups
Data reported are the percent of students achieving at the proficient or advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard) and percent not tested. For mathematics, science, and history/social science, data regarding the percent not tested, by grade level and subgroup, are available at http://star.cde.ca.gov/.
 Performance Level  African-
American
 American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
 Asian  Filipino  Hispanic
or Latino
 Pacific
Islander
 White
(not
Hispanic)
English Language Arts
 Proficient or Advanced  30    60  59  51    60
 Not Tested  6    0  4  0    6
Mathematics
 Proficient or Advanced  33    76  71  51    73
 Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---
Science
 Proficient or Advanced              
 Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---
History/Social Science
 Proficient or Advanced              
 Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---

CST - Subgroups
Data reported are the percent of students achieving at the proficient or advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard) and percent not tested. For mathematics, science, and history/social science, data regarding the percent not tested, by grade level and subgroup, are available at http://star.cde.ca.gov/.
Performance Level  Male  Female English
Learners
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
Students With
Disabilities
Migrant
Education
Services
Yes No Yes No
English Language Arts
 Proficient or Advanced  47  58  31  28  59  25  54  
 Not Tested  3  3  0  5  2  31  0  
Mathematics
 Proficient or Advanced  62  61  54  39  68  40  63  
 Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---
Science
 Proficient or Advanced                
 Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---
History/Social Science
 Proficient or Advanced                
 Not Tested  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---

Norm-Referenced Test (NRT)
Reading and mathematics results from the Norm-Referenced Test (NRT), adopted by the State Board of Education (this was the Stanford 9 test up until 2003, but was changed to the California Achievement Test, Sixth Edition for 2003), are reported for each grade level as the percent of tested students scoring at or above the 50th percentile (the national average). School results are compared to results at the district and state levels. Detailed information regarding results for each grade level can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov/ or by speaking with the school principal. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.

NRT - All Students
Data reported are the percent of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile.
Subject  School  District  State
 2001  2002  2003  2001  2002  2003  2001  2002  2003
 Reading  72  71  50  35  34  33  44  45  43
 Mathematics  78  79  67  40  42  37  53  55  50

NRT - Racial/Ethnic Groups
Data reported are the percent of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile.
Subject  African-
American
 American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
 Asian  Filipino  Hispanic
or Latino
 Pacific
Islander
 White
(not
Hispanic)
 Reading  36    49  59  42    60
 Mathematics  52    72  73  60    73

NRT - Subgroups
Data reported are the percent of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile.
Subject    Male    Female  English
Learners
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged
 Students With
Disabilities
 Migrant
Education
Services
 Yes  No  Yes  No
 Reading  44  56  40  35  54  25  52  
 Mathematics  66  67  47  48  72  45  68  


California Physical Fitness Test
Data reported are the percent of students meeting fitness standards (scoring in the healthy fitness zone on all six fitness standards). Detailed information regarding the California Physical Fitness Test may be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/statetests/pe/pe.html. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.
 Grade
Level
 School  District  State
  Total   Female   Male    Total   Female   Male    Total   Female   Male 
 5  37.2  29.3  45.9  12.2  11.3  13.1  23.8  25.2  22.3
 7        19.0  18.0  20.0  27.8  29.6  26.0
 9        11.0  7.7  13.9  24.8  23.3  26.2

Academic Performance Index (API)

The Academic Performance Index (API) is a score on a scale of 200 to 1000 that annually measures the academic performance and progress of individual schools in California. On an interim basis, the state has set 800 as the API score that schools should strive to meet.

Growth Targets: The annual growth target for a school is 5 percent of the distance between its Base API and 800. The growth target for a school at or above 800 is to remain at or above 800. Actual growth is the number of API points a school gained between its base and growth years. Schools that reach their annual targets are eligible for awards. Schools that do not meet their targets and have a statewide API rank of one to five are eligible to participate in the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program (II/USP), which provides resources to schools to improve their academic achievement. There was no money allocated to the II/USP Program in 2002 or 2003.

Subgroup APIs and Targets: In addition to a schoolwide API, schools also receive API scores for each numerically significant subgroup in the school (i.e., racial/ethnic subgroups and socioeconomically disadvantaged students). Growth targets, equal to 80 percent of the school's target, are also set for each of the subgroups. Each subgroup must also meet its target for the school to be eligible for awards.

Percent Tested: In order to be eligible for awards, elementary and middle schools must test at least 95 percent of their students in grades 2-8 and high schools must test at least 90 percent of their students in grades 9-11 on STAR.

Statewide Rank: Schools receiving a Base API score are ranked in ten categories of equal size (deciles) from one (lowest) to ten (highest), according to type of school (elementary, middle, or high school).

Similar Schools Rank: Schools also receive a ranking that compares that school to 100 other schools with similar demographic characteristics. Each set of 100 schools is ranked by API score from one (lowest) to ten (highest) to indicate how well the school performed compared to schools most like it.

API criteria are subject to change as new legislation is enacted into law. Detailed information about the API and the Public Schools Accountability Act (PSAA) can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/psaa/api/ or by speaking with the school principal.

Schoolwide API
 API Base Data  API Growth Data
   2000  2001  2002   From
2000
to 2001
From
2001
to 2002
From
2002
to 2003
 Percent Tested  100  100  100  Percent Tested  100  100  99
 API Base Score  802  799  804  API Growth Score  819  801  795
 Growth Target  #  1  A  Actual Growth  17  2  -9
 Statewide Rank  9  8  9  
 Similar Schools Rank  9  7  6

API Subgroups - Racial/Ethnic Groups
 API Base Data  API Growth Data
   2000  2001  2002   From
2000
to 2001
From
2001
to 2002
From
2002
to 2003
 African-American  African-American
 API Base Score  664  639  677  API Growth Score  667  640  681
 Growth Target  1  1  1  Actual Growth  3  1  4
 Asian  Asian
 API Base Score  881  875  838  API Growth Score  883  839  846
 Growth Target  #  A  A  Actual Growth  2  -36  8
 Filipino  Filipino
 API Base Score  826  845  850  API Growth Score  860  867  829
 Growth Target  #  A  A  Actual Growth  34  22  -21
 White (Not Hispanic)  White (Not Hispanic)
 API Base Score  815  849    API Growth Score  870    817
 Growth Target  #  A    Actual Growth  55    

API Subgroups - Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
 API Base Data  API Growth Data
   2000  2001  2002   From
2000
to 2001
From
2001
to 2002
From
2002
to 2003
 API Base Score  666  649  693  API Growth Score  669  682  654
 Growth Target  1  1  1  Actual Growth  3  33  -39

Awards and Intervention Programs
Eligibility for statewide award or intervention programs is based on API growth data from the previous academic year.
The Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program was not funded for the year 2002 or 2003.

 School  District
 Federal Programs  2001  2002  2003  Federal Programs  2001  2002  2003
 Recognition for
 Achievement (Title 1)
 No  No  No  Number of Schools Identified
 for Program Improvement
 0  0  8
 Identified for Program
 Improvement (Title 1)
 No  No  No  Percent of Schools Identified
 for Program Improvement
 0.0  0.0  12.7
 Exited Title 1 Program
 Improvement
 No  No  No  
 Years Identified for
 Program Improvement
     
 California Programs  2001  2002  2003
 Eligible for Governor's
 Performance Award
 No  No  No
 
 Eligible for II/USP
 No  ---  ---
 
 Applied for II/USP Funding
 No  ---  ---
 
 Received II/USP Funding
 No  ---  ---

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
The federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) requires that all students perform at or above the proficient level on the state's standards-based assessments by 2014. In order to achieve this goal and meet annual performance objectives, districts and schools must improve each year according to set requirements. Data reported show whether all groups of students in the school made Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). Detailed information about AYP can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ayp/ or by speaking with the school principal.
 Groups  School  District
 2001  2002  2003  2001  2002  2003
 All Students  ---  ---  Yes  ---  ---  Yes
 African American  ---  ---  Yes  ---  ---  Yes
 American Indian or Alaska Native  ---  ---  N/A  ---  ---  N/A
 Asian  ---  ---  Yes  ---  ---  Yes
 Filipino  ---  ---  Yes  ---  ---  Yes
 Hispanic or Latino  ---  ---  N/A  ---  ---  Yes
 Pacific Islander  ---  ---  N/A  ---  ---  Yes
 White (not Hispanic)  ---  ---  N/A  ---  ---  Yes
 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged  ---  ---  Yes  ---  ---  Yes
 English Learners  ---  ---  Yes  ---  ---  Yes
 Students with Disabilities  ---  ---  N/A  ---  ---  No

IV. School Completion (Secondary Schools)

California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE)
Beginning with the graduating class of 2006, students in California public schools will have to pass the California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) to receive a high school diploma. The School Accountability Report Card for that year will report the percent of students completing grade 12 who successfully completed the CAHSEE.
These data are not required to be reported until 2006 when they can be reported for the entire potential graduating class. When implemented, the data will be disaggregated by special education status, English language learners, socioeconomic status, gender, and ethnic group.

V. Class Size

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution
Data reported are the average class size and the number of classrooms that fall into each category (i.e., number of students), by grade level, as reported by CBEDS.
 Grade  2001  2002  2003
 Avg.
Class
Size
Number of Classrooms  Avg.
Class
Size
Number of Classrooms  Avg.
Class
Size
Number of Classrooms
 1-20  21-32  33+  1-20  21-32  33+  1-20  21-32  33+
 K  17.25  4      19.25  4      19.75  4    
 1  19.67  3      18.25  4      19.50  4    
 2  20.00  2      20.00  4      18.50  4    
 3  20.00  4      20.00  4      19.67  6    
 4  32.50    1  1  33.00      2  33.00      1
 5  33.00      2  32.00    1  1  33.00      2
 6  33.00      1                
 K-3  20.00  3      18.00  2            
 3-4                  20.00  1    
 4-8  32.00    1    32.00    1    33.00      1
 Other                        


Class Size Reduction Participation
California's K-3 Class Size Reduction program began in 1996 for children in kindergarten and grades one through three. Funding is provided to participating school districts to decrease the size of K-3 classes to 20 or fewer students per certificated teacher. Data reported are the percent of students in each grade level in the school that are in a class size reduction classroom.
 Grade Level  Percent of Students Participating
 2001  2002  2003
 K  100  100  100
 1  100  100  100
 2  100  100  100
 3  100  100  100

VI. Teacher and Staff Information

Teacher Credentials
Data reported are the number of teachers (full-time and part-time). Each teacher is counted as '1'. If a teacher works at two schools, he/she is only counted at one school. Data are not available for teachers with a full credential and teaching outside his/her subject area.
     2001      2002      2003  
 Total Teachers
 
 27  26  25
 Teachers with Full Credential
 (full credential and teaching in subject area)
 22  23  23
 Teachers with Emergency Credential
 (includes District Internship, University Internship, Pre-Interns, and Emergency Permits)
 7  3  2
 Teachers with Waivers
 (does not have credential and does not qualify for an Emergency Permit)
     

Highly Qualified Teachers
The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) requires local educational agencies (LEAs) to report specific data regarding highly qualified teachers. As of December of 2003, the State Board of Education (SBE) had not approved a definition for use in reporting data pertaining to highly qualified teachers. Therefore, the requirement that LEAs include these data will not apply to reports published during the 2003-04 school year.
The State Board of Education is scheduled to approve a definition for "highly qualified teacher" in 2004. Once approved, LEAs will be required to use the definition to provide data on report cards published during the 2004-05 school year.

Teacher Evaluations
The primary purpose of evaluation is to improve the educational programs, practices and services within the schools through increased effectiveness of each teacher. As outlined in the contract between the district and United Teachers of Richmond, temporary and probationary teachers are evaluated at least once each school year. Permanent teachers are formally evaluated every other year. If any deficiency is noted, the evaluator provides support such as specific suggestions and the opportunity to visit other classrooms. If a teacher receives an "Unsatisfactory" evaluation, he/she is required to participate in the district's Peer Assistance and Review (PAR) program. Our district is piloting a new evaluation system in a few schools that is based on the California Standards for the Teaching Profession. This pilot includes teacher self-assessment, professional growth plans and objectives, and guided reflection.  

Substitute Teachers
Teachers and other personnel report absences using an automated phone system called SubFinder. Teachers may contact a substitute themselves, or direct the SubFinder system to locate a substitute. We are usually able to find substitute teachers when needed. Occasionally there are not enough substitutes to fill all positions, and the administrators and teachers at the school assume the responsibilities of the absent staff member. 


VII. Curriculum and Instruction

School Instruction and Leadership

The site administrator brings extensive teaching curriculum and professional development experience to her principalship. To achieve the goal of building a fully inclusive and responsive learning community, the school leadership is distributed among staff and community members. Our community uses its equity-based mission statement to guide its decision-making and program planning. The Instructional Leadership Team consisting of a teacher from

each grade level facilitates the staff's professional cycle of inquiry and promotes communication among the grade levels. This ongoing improvement cycle guides our analysis of student need, our planning and implementation of our data-driven, standards-based core curriculum and our reflection on its effectiveness. Teachers use this cycle to inform their continuing modification and refinement of our school program. The team also reports to our School Site Council, plans the staff retreat and assists with the annual revision of our school plan.

Informed by our cycle of inquiry and parent input, the staff identified reading comprehension and writing strategies as their instructional focus areas. Students develop and extend essential reading and writing strategies as they learn to read and read to learn. The core curriculum is based on the district standards and uses research-based teaching strategies. All students have equal access to the core curriculum. Teachers meeting grade level groups to discuss students' needs and to plan the range of instruction, coaching and guided practice needed to insure all students' successful engagement with the curriculum. They use a variety of teaching, learning, and grouping strategies to provide students with differentiated instruction and the help necessary to achieve grade level standards. K-3 teachers collaborate to plan and implement an appropriately leveled, flexibly grouped “by name, by need” intervention program to assist students at risk. Grades four through five teachers collaborate with the resource specialist, NSH teacher and the Special Education Department to plan and implement a similar model within a learning center context. Intermediate teachers provide challenging, differentiated instruction that allows students to work beyond the core curriculum. The teachers of English Language Learners meet regularly to discuss instructional strategies, assessment and student progress. English learners receive standards-based ELD instruction. They also receive the specialized support of sheltered instruction and a weekly after-school program. Students with learning disabilities receive targeted support coordinated by an Individual Learning Plan. Classroom teachers collaborate and consult with Special Education support staff on how best to address their learning needs. Teachers monitor student progress through the analysis of student work, observation and performance assessments. They share student progress data at a fall Parent Teacher Conference and use the newly adopted standards-based report card to detail grade level achievement benchmarks and to keep parents informed of their child's progress toward these grade level standards.


Professional Development
The primary areas of focus of staff development are literacy and mathematics. These areas were identified four years ago as part of the district's strategic planning. Student achievement data was used to determine the goals and the need for professional development. Teachers attend a minimum of 18 hours of professional development as negotiated by their contract. Continuous professional development is offered above and beyond that in literacy and mathematics through seminars, workshops, and coaching. Classroom Management training is available with follow-up support sessions. The district technology plan supports technology training opportunities for teachers. New teachers have the opportunity to participate in the BTSA program that provides a variety of on-going professional development experiences and individual support mentors. Our Pre-intern, Intern and Paraprofessional grants provide teachers with classes and opportunities to receive their teaching credentials. The district PAR program provides one coach who supports teachers experiencing difficulty through one-on-one coaching, a classroom visitation network, and on-going workshops. Paraprofessionals are offered customized workshops at our annual Classified Training Day. Classroom instructional aides are provided classes to support their being NCLB compliant. Non-instructional aides are provided customized training at the Classified Training Day as well as other on-going professional development opportunities provided by their individual departments. The methods by which professional development is delivered includes: weeklong seminars and academies, follow-up workshops and coaching, after-school workshops, Saturday workshops, and conference attendance. Teachers are supported by: principals, who have the same core curriculum professional development training opportunities as teachers; in-class coaching by outside consultants, curriculum guides, and support providers; and grade-level/department/school-wide meetings to analyze student performance data.   

Quality and Currency of Textbooks and Other Instructional Materials

WCCUSD K-8 textbooks adoptions

In support of our district-wide focus on literacy, we began using the following language arts textbooks and materials in 2002-03: Open Court for kindergarten through fifth grade; Prentice Hall for sixth through eighth grade; and, High Point for fourth through eighth graders who need intervention.

In 2001-02, we adopted the following texts: In math, Harcourt Brace for K-6, and Prentice Hall for Pre-Algebra students. In science, Holt for 6-8. In social studies, McGraw Hill Adventures in Time & Place for K-3, and Harcourt Brace for 4-6. Houghton Mifflin for Grade 7, and, Holt, Rinehart and Winston for Grade 8.

In 2003-04, we adopted Algebra Structure and Method, McDougal Litell by Brown, Dolciani, et al. for our Algebra 1 students, and Prentice Hall Algebra by Smith, Charles, et al for Algebra 1A and 1B students.

Our language arts, math, social studies, and grade 7-8 science texts are all standards based and selected from state-approved lists. We have used a hands-on, kit-based science adoption, the Full Option Science System, in grades K-5 for several years. We are working to supplement the FOSS kits with other materials in order to provide our students with standards-based science instruction.

Current, core-subject textbooks are provided for each student.  

Instructional Minutes
The California Education Code establishes the required number of instructional minutes per year for each grade. Data reported compares the number of instructional minutes offered at the school level to the state requirement for each grade.
 Grade
Level
 Instructional Minutes
 Offered  State Requirement
 K  36,000  36,000
 1  50,455  50,400
 2  50,455  50,400
 3  50,455  50,400
 4  54,035  54,000
 5  54,035  54,000

Total Number of Minimum Days
There are 12 minimum days – the first day of school, Back to School Night, Halloween, parent conference days (5 minimum days), the day before Thanksgiving, the day before winter break, Open House, and the last day of school.  


IX. Fiscal and Expenditure Data

Average Salaries (Fiscal Year 2001-2002)
Data reported are the district average salary for teachers, principals, and superintendents, compared to the state average salaries for districts of the same type and size, as defined by Education Code Section 41409. The district average principal salary is shown separately for elementary, middle, and high schools, but the state average principal salary is combined.
 Category  District
Amount
 State Average
For Districts
In Same Category
 Beginning Teacher Salary  33110  35980
 Mid-Range Teacher Salary  48542  57139
 Highest Teacher Salary  63744  73953
 Average Principal Salary (Elementary)  77713  100810
 Average Principal Salary (Middle)  80822
 Average Principal Salary (High)  88026
 Superintendent Salary  154499  171096
 Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries  39.23  43.28
 Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries  5.08  5.20

Expenditures (Fiscal Year 2001-2002)
Data reported are total dollars expended in the district, and the dollars expended per student at the district compared to the state average. Detailed information regarding expenditures may be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fiscal/financial/.
 District  District  State Average
For Districts
In Same Category
 State Average
All Districts
 Total Dollars  Dollars per Student
(ADA)
 Dollars per Student
(ADA)
 Dollars per Student
(ADA)
 $241095326  $7328  $6770  $6719

Types of Services Funded

Eighty percent of our operating expenditures go to salaries and benefits of teachers and support staff. Other expenses include books, supplies, and operational services such as utilities.

Much of the operating revenues we receive from state, federal and local resources is for programs with specific guidelines and regulations governing their use. Examples include Special Education, Title I, II, II, V, School Improvement, Healthy Start, Gifted and Talented, Tenth Grade Counseling, Immediate Intervention Underperforming Schools Program and High Priority Schools grants.

Revenues generated by the passage of two local bond measures, Measure M and Measure D, are accounted for in separate bond funds and designated exclusively for building modernization.